Sir-82,
I think she was caught off guard, but, according to Paul Revere's account, she was historically accurate.
He wrote it, she said it, and that's the fact of the matter.
Whoever wants to say "she meant this, he meant that, this guy says this, this guy says that" doesn't change anything, except for those who fall for that kind of persuasion.
JDW
You've come to this conclusion based on your own hypothetical??No. It's called observation.
We can't see it, because it isn't there.It's not that you can't see it, it's that you don't want to see it.
JDW
If only we would listen to Beck and Limbaugh we'd be all straightened out...Excuse me, but when, and where, have I EVER said this?
JDW
Sir-82,
In a nutshell, my issue is with the media and how it coddles the left and vilfies the right, and you brainwashed fools cannot see it.
JDW
"Boston University history professor Brendan McConville said, “Basically when Paul Revere was stopped by the British, he did say to them, ‘Look, there is a mobilization going on that you’ll be confronting,’ and the British are aware as they’re marching down the countryside, they hear church bells ringing — she was right about that — and warning shots being fired. That’s accurate.”"
It doesn't pass YOUR smell test because it wasn't a flaming left-winger who said it.
If, uhhh, Obama had said it, you would be saying "Oh, see how smart he is! He gave us a lesson in history! That's why we elected him! He's the smartest President the USA has ever had! Ohhhh, ohhhh."
And then all of you, including Chis Matthews, would have had a mass orgasm.
JDW
"In fact, Revere’s own account of the ride in a 1798 letter seems to back up Palin’s claim"
From the article. Read it yourself.
JDW
Read it and tell us who the dumbf**ks are now.
Or rather, read it and keep your mouths shut, like you usually do, when you find out you jumped the gun and embarrassed yourself, like some of you do, and you know who I'm talking to, and about, so don't play dumb. But then again, you may not BE playing.
JDW
